On 2018/08/26 Mr Taylor became Australia's Energy Minister. Has there ever been, anywhere, a Minister for Energy so dishonestly biased against renewable energy? While Mr Taylor is Energy Minister how can any Australian have any pride in their nation?
|Waterloo Wind Farm|
What do the Australian people want?A Lowy Institute poll carried out on 1,200 Australian adults on 2018/06/20 showed that 84% of Australians wanted the government to "focus on renewables, even if this means we may need to invest more in infrastructure to make the system more reliable".
A poll of the people in Mr Taylor's electorate showed that almost twice as many wanted to see Australia decrease its emissions faster, rather than slower.
Plainly the Australian people want renewable energy, not more coal power.
Has there ever been a federal minister more out of touch with what the Australian people want, what is best for Australia and what the world needs?
I've written about
who wants renewable energy? elsewhere on this site.
A consortium has proposed the Asia Renewable Energy Hub in Western Australia's Pilbara to install 11 GW of wind and solar power and export electricity to Indonesia and possibly Singapore via undersea cables. They have secured funding from the Macquarie Group. The total value of the development is likely to be around Aus$20 billion.
As Parkinson wrote, "The scale of the project is enormous – equivalent to more than the entire capacity of large scale wind and solar projects being built for the national renewable energy target."
If Mr Taylor has anything to do with it he would probably stop the development because of his hatred for wind power.
I have written more on Australia's likelihood of missing economic opportunities because of Mr Taylor's prejudices elsewhere on this page.
The Guardian, 2018/09/30, journalist Katherine Murphy states:
"... while there is evidence from market analysts and analysis from the government's energy bodies that renewables has led the price drop because of a big increase in supply contracted into the market courtesy of the renewable energy target, Taylor attributed the recent reductions to the government's intervention in the gas market, and regulatory reforms, including forcing retailers to be more transparent about their pricing."
And Origin EnergyIn a piece titled Origin says solar cheaper than coal, moving on from base-load in RenewEconomy, 2018/10/02, Giles Parkinson reported Greg Jarvis, the company’s head of energy trading and operations as saying:
"I have been in this game for so long … the one thing I have seen is just the cost of renewables really change the game. It is amazing what we have been seeing."Giles Parkinson also wrote:
"Jarvis also made it clear that Origin Energy has moved on from thinking about new generation in terms of “base-load”, which stands in sharp contrast to current government thinking and the conservative commentariat."
And British Billionaire Sanjeev GuptaSanjeev Gupta, the man who saved Whyalla's steel works and is investing a billion dollars in renewable energy developments in Australia was reported by Sophie Vorrath on RenewEconomy, 2018/07/23, as saying "Renewables are cheaper than coal."; "It's obvious".
Mr Gupta is investing in renewables because he can see that is where the future of energy lies. If Mr Taylor was as canny as Mr Gupta and we using his own money rather than the taxpayers' money he would also be going with renewables rather than fossil fuels.
Mr Taylor's statement about wind power being "gobsmackingly inefficient" is obviously absurdThe Chinese installed 13 000MW (about 5000 wind turbines) in year 2012, the year in which Mr Taylor made his statement. For the ten years to 2012 the Chinese economy has grown by about 9 per cent per year. This suggests that the Chinese know what they are doing, but perhaps if the Chinese had our Angus Taylor to tell them how "gobsmackingly inefficient" wind turbines were they would manage a growth rate of 15 per cent per year? Angus, do
Unlike Mr Taylor, the people in charge of the Chinese economy believe that wind power is very efficient. (I've written about the efficiency of wind turbines elsewhere on these pages.)
Wind energy is recognised world-wide as being a highly viable form of renewable energy and it is growing exponentially. Mr Taylor is right in one thing; we should be looking at all the possible ways in which we might reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but perhaps Mr Taylor does not realise that most of the strategies he recommends are already being pursued. In his opposition to wind power he is out of touch with almost all those who want to reduce emissions.
PJM, the independent grid operator for all or parts of 13 US states produced a report that confirmed that wind energy is decreasing both the price of electricity and emissions of harmful pollutants. (See Into The Wind.) This totally contradicts Mr Taylor's stance on the 'inefficiency' and 'high cost' of wind power.
Mr Taylor's association with Alan Jones and the ignorant anti-wind power blog Stop These Things would be enough to make the more perceptive of the public sceptical of his utterances, but this is probably not the audience he is aiming at.
A recent report from the Clean Energy Council gave a very different picture. The following was extracted from the CEC report:
Cherry picking is the selection of evidence that suits ones preconceptions, while ignoring all the evidence that is contrary. Wind power opponents often use cherry picking.
The overwhelming bulk of the evidence on land prices and wind farms tells us that the presence of a wind farm has very little effect on land values. For example, the US Berkeley Laboratory analysed more than 50 000 home sales near 67 wind facilities in 27 counties across nine US states, yet was unable to uncover any impacts to nearby home property values. See Into The Wind, 2013/08/26.
The graphs on the right were created using data from propertyvalue.com.au by Victorian Greens MP Greg Barber (see here). Each is in an area where a wind farm has been built. The graphs clearly show that there are no long-term declines in land values associated with wind farms. I have produced similar graphs from South Australian property values (using realestate.com.au), but as they all show the same trend as Greg's graphs it seems superflous to display them here.
The Financial Review on 2013/10/14 published a piece on registered land valuer Peter Reardon who produced a report stating that land values can fall by 30% or even 60% due to nearby wind farms. Not surprisingly this report has been spread around by those who oppose wind power, including Mr Taylor. A critique of the study can be read on Renew Economy.
How many properties near wind farms were involved in Mr Reardons study? Three.
How were the properties chosen? We were not told.
What other factors might have been involved in the perceived values of the properties?
Mr Reardon tells us that one of them, 'Cullerin' (lots 21, 22, 24 and 25, Hume Highway and Lerida Road), has the Hume Highway passing through it. This is probably the busiest interstate highway in Australia, with trucks going through at all hours of the day and the night. Certainly any sound from the wind farm would not be a problem, no-one would hear the turbines because of the traffic noise. Mr Reardon writes about the properties in the area being attractive to 'tree changers' and people looking for a country 'retreat'. Who would want a hobby farm within a few hundred metres of the noisiest highway in the nation?
Since the original writing of this piece further information has come to me via a third party and apparently from the new owner of the 'Cullerin'. It seems that it is bisected by not only one (as Reardon stated) but two high voltage power lines; not only is the highway passing through, but there are also two truck parking bays (so there would be trucks starting and stopping, with all the noise associated, at any time of the day and night) and 30% of the block has water-logging and drainage problems. Is it at all surprising that this block had a low market price?
Mr Taylor used Reardon's study in an article published in the Goulburn Post on 2013/10/21 as sufficient evidence to claim that:
Well, not actually in 'some cases' Mr Taylor, Mr Reardon's study claims a 60% lower value in one case (Taylers Creek Road). One of the three cases showed no change in value.
And what did Mr Taylor say about all the studies that show negligible negative impact on land prices? Nothing.
The graphs on the right were created using data from
by Victorian Greens MP Greg Barber (see
Each is in an area where a wind farm has been built.
The graphs clearly show that there are no long-term declines in land values
associated with wind farms.
"vowed to continue his campaign against 'the bad economics' of heavily subsidising wind energy developments, when there were 'far cheaper ways to reduce carbon emissions'"Mr Taylor has made these statements before; they do not stand up to scrutiny.
Mr Taylor has listed 'changes in building practices', 'home solar water' and 'household energy efficiency' as some measures that are much cheaper options for reducing emissions than wind energy. It is quite true that these things should be pursued and they are being pursued, but they are not enough, and it is not easy for governments to make people or businesses save energy.
Mr Taylor is unable to specify any cheaper ways of reducing emissions that are both practical and are not already being pursued.
Are wind farms really subsidised? What about fossil fuels?Utility scale wind power is not generally subsidised but the operators do receive a bonus on the electricity that they produce. This adds about 1¢ to the price that consumers pay for each kilowatt-hour of electricity (typically around 25¢).
This section records an exchange between Mr Taylor and me that was held on
his Facebook page in late 2012.
When it became clear that Mr Taylor was losing the argument he deleted the
The fact that Mr Taylor is a contributor to, and apparently an admirer of, the anonymously authored anti wind power site
Stop These Things which specialises in name-calling, abuse, ad hominem (personal) attacks and has a blatant disregard for the truth, tells us quite a lot about Mr Taylor.
I have written about and linked to several independent assessments of Stop These Things elsewhere on this site.
If the author of STT was to make his (the behaviour is difficult to attribute to a woman) identity public he would be sued for a number of libellous statements that he has made.
It is often said, with considerable justification, that we are judged by the company we keep.
With much less time to prepare, a group of pro-renewable people organised a much more successful pro-wind, pro-renewables rally for the same time and the other side of Lake Burley-Griffin.
The Jones-STT rally 'crowd' is shown in the photo at the right. As can be seen, a large proportion of those who attended were from the media. A part of the crowd at the pro-renewables rally, estimated at from 500 to 1000, is in the photo below.
On the day, there were far more people at the pro-renewable rally than at the anti-wind rally.
Angus Taylor and
Alan Jones have liked to feed each other's taste for fantasy since at least the failed anti-wind power rally, mentioned
An article by Giles Parkinson in Renew Economy, dated 2018/09/05, shows that the relationship is still strong.
No doubt they are talking to people who are content to be fed anti-renewable power guff and are not concerned about fact.
Anyone involved in a business that used a significant amount of energy would probably not remain long in that business if they took seriously the rubbish talked by Jones and Taylor in these sessions.
Wikipedia, 2018/09/29, gives two apparently contradictory quotes from Mr Taylor (reminiscent of ex
Angus Taylor became Minister for Energy in the Liberal/National coalition Morrison Australian federal government.
Like the earlier coalition
Turnbull governments Taylor and the Morrison Government are badly
out of touch with what the Australian people want.
While Taylor is opposed to renewable energy the
Australian people are strongly in favour of much more renewables.
Minister Taylor plainly is opposed to action on climate change while the majority of Australians recognise that "global warming is a serious and pressing problem" and want action even at significant costs, only 10% believe that global warming is in doubt.
Some of Minister Taylor's lies
Minister Taylor continues to criticise South Australia's adoption of a high percentage of renewable energy in contradiction of the fact that it can be shown to be
a great success.
If Taylor has his way Australia will miss out on developments that will follow on from the adoption of large amounts of renewable energy. I've discussed these opportunities in a section of a page about Australia's energy future. They include:
I have written about the potential for economic growth in the energy sector being in renewables rather than in fossil fuels elsewhere on this page. Fossil fuels, particularly coal, are on the way out.
I have argued
elsewhere that a person in a position of power knowingly lying in an effort to slow action on
climate change is committing a crime against humanity.
The burning of fossil fuels is not only one of the main causes of climate change and
ocean acidification, the air pollution it creates
kills millions of people each year.
Climate change and ocean acidification will cause thousands or even millions of species to become extinct and no doubt the air pollution from the burning of fossil fuels is also having a huge impact on many non-human species. A person in a position of power intentionally lying to perpetuate these damages is guilty of a crime against the biosphere.
For a person in the position of minister for energy in a nation with one of the highest per-capita rates of greenhouse gas emissions in the world and one of the highest potentials for effective action is particularly bad.
The Weekly Times Now, 2012/09/05, published the following:
"Taylor is a director at Port Jackson Partners, a consulting firm that has
worked for big agricultural companies and the Minerals Council of Australia
on issues such as coal-seam gas, carbon and foreign investment."
It has been reported that the following was on the Crookwell Conversation Facebook page, although I have been unable to confirm it:
"Mr Taylor has a personal interest in wind power as the wind industry were once circling the Taylor family property at Nimmitabel. The family refused an invitation to host wind turbines."There are few people as opposed to wind turbines as those who see their neighbours doing very well financially by hosting wind turbines, while themselves missing out. It is envy.
Mr Taylor should be careful to declare his interests when discussing things like fossil fuels versus renewable energy.
External pagesThe 'Big 3' energy companies recognise the future is with renewables, leaders of industry like Sanjeev Gupta see it, the great majority of Australians want more renewable energy; is it only Liberals like Angus Taylor and the fossil fuel industry who are supporting the old system?
AGL: Renewables; Committed to helping shape a sustainable energy future for Australia. "We're proud to be the largest ASX-listed investor in renewable energy generation in the country."
ARENA: the Australian Renewable Energy Agency.
The Australia Institute
CEFC: Clean Energy Finance Corporation.
"Coal is no longer cheaper – and we'll prove it": Sanjeev Gupta, the British billionaire who saved the Whyalla steel industry knows that the future lies with renewables.
Energy Australia: Supporting "Right now, EnergyAustralia has the rights to more than 490 megawatts of electricity generated by wind farms in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia."
Origin Energy: 6 Ways Origin is Tackling Climate Change.
Renew Economy: Can Angus Taylor stop the renewables and storage revolution?
Angus Taylor signals further taxpayer investment in existing coal and gas; The Guardian, 2018/09/30.
On this siteAustralia's energy future
End of coal: why the coal industry has a very limited future.
Ethics: a subject that Mr Taylor would do well to learn about.
Greenhouse/climate change: the greatest threat currently facing mankind.
Killer coal: how the burning of coal kills millions of people world-wide each year.
Selfishness or altruism?: self or all?
Stop These Things; a very dishonest anti-wind power Web site admired by, and contributed to by, Mr Taylor
Wind power lies; Mr Taylor features strongly
Wind power opposition: almost universally dishonest.
Climate skeptic? Or not?
Failed anti-wind farm rally
Angus Taylor shares Fantasy Land with Alan Jones
Misrepresented of the reasons for electricity price reductions
Missing economic opportunities
Mr Taylor's background
Out of touch
Peter Reardon's 'study'
Potential for economic growth is in renewables
Stop These Things and Mr Taylor
Subsidies? Cheaper ways of reducing carbon emissions?
Warren Buffett's $1B wind purchase