On this page...

Water supply matters
Using seawater
Related pages

Pumped-hydro power: why do we need it?


What is pumped hydro?

It is a way of storing energy. When electricity is plentiful and cheap a pumped hydro station will pump water from a low-level storage to a high-level storage. When electricity is in short supply and expensive, the water runs from the high storage, through a turbine – generating electricity, and back into the low storage.
The leading renewable energy options, wind and solar PV, are only available when the wind is blowing or the light is bright, respectively.

With the impacts of climate change becoming annually more obvious and serious it is clear that we must either greatly reduce our energy consumption or replace fossil fuels with renewable energy if we are to preserve the planet in a fair state for future generations.

This is not an ideal world; people are not willing to greatly decrease their energy consumption, they demand cheap and abundant energy. Therefore we need massive renewable energy development and massive amounts of energy storage for the periods when renewable energy is not available.

In mid 2017 pumped hydro power was the best available way of storing these massive amounts of energy.

This page written 2017/09/21, modified 2017/09/30 – ©
Contact: email daveclarkecb@yahoo.com (David K. Clarke)

Google search Ramblings

USA Department of Energy graph
Energy storage
This shows clearly that the vast majority of the world's energy storage is in the form of pumped hydro.
Much of it was built to allow power grids dominated by inflexible nuclear power to respond to variations in demand.

Tumut 3 power and pumped hydro station, Snowy Mountains, New South Wales, Australia
The power station generates electricity when water flows from the upper storage, Talbingo Dam, into the lower storage, Jounama Pondage. When power is plentiful and cheap water is pumped from Jounama up to Talbingo. More information on this installation is on another page on this site; I've listed other pumped hydro sites in Australia on a page about the forms of electricity generation that are right for Australia.

Energy or power?

Energy is defined in physics as the capacity for doing work; power is a flow of energy. Example: a 10 Watt LED light bulb uses 10 Watts of power; in one hour it will use 10 Watt-hours of energy.

There is a lot of confusion between energy and power, even in people who should be well aware of the distinction.


Pumped hydro is peaking power, not base load

In August and September 2017 there had been a lot of confusion between base load and peaking power in statements from politicians supporting the coal lobby, such as PM Turnbull. Coal and nuclear power stations inflexibly generate base load power; peaking power such as from pumped hydro, generated as required, is far more valuable.

Why we should use pumped hydro to store large amounts of energy?

  1. It is the cheapest way of storing large amounts of energy; greater than a few hundred megawatt-hours (MWh). (An Australian National University group under Andrew Blakers identified 5000 sites in mid 2017 each seven to 1000 times larger than the Tesla Big Battery proposed for Hornsdale, SA; that is, bigger than 1 GWh.)
  2. Once built, a pumped hydro system has a long life.

How does pumped hydro differ from conventional hydro power?

Conventional hydro only allows for water to flow out of a high level storage through turbines to generate power. It cannot pump in the other direction when electricity is cheap. It relies on rain to fill the storage.

Building a pumped hydro system results in much less environmental damage than building conventional hydro because the storages can be much smaller and pumped hydro can be recharged as often as needed.

What are the alternatives to pumped hydro?

Batteries (electro-chemical)

Batteries are the obvious alternative. The Tesla big battery to be built at Hornsdale in Mid-North South Australia in late 2017 has had a lot of publicity as the biggest battery in the world: it will store 129 MWh of energy (it will be able to release this at a maximum power of 100 MW).

By far the greatest part of the materials required to build a pumped hydro system have a simple chemistry and are easily disposed of, or recycled, at the end of their useful lives: steel, concrete, earth, rock;
Lithium-based batteries, on the other hand, have complex chemistries and are difficult or impossible to recycle fully.

Flywheels (electro mechanical)

These can be used for storing very limited amounts of energy with a very rapid response time.

Hydrogen storage

Seems to have great potential for medium- to long-term storage of large amounts of energy, but at the present it is very expensive and not very efficient. There was a Power to hydrogen trial announced in August 2017 in South Australia.

Thermal storage

Molten salt is often used as the working fluid in a solar thermal power station; it can be stored efficiently for a period of several hours up to a few days. Well and good for a solar thermal power station, however, using electricity to heat something like salt and then using the hot salt to produce steam and generate electricity is very inefficient.

Water supply matters

Pilot floating solar power installation
floating solar
On common effluent ponds at Jamestown in Mid-North South Austalia
The quantities of water required for pumped hydro storages of the type being considered in Australia are of the order of a gigalitre and the hydraulic heads needed are typically 100 m or more. In Energy Units I have noted that the energy involved in 1 GL falling 100 m is 270 MWh. A gigalitre is one billion litres or a million kilolitres.

In What is the real cost of water?, written 2007/09/14 I noted that the cost of water in Australia varied from $0.0013/kL ($1.30/ML) in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area to around $1/kL for a domestic consumer in South Australia (the cost to domestic consumers in SA had increased to around $3/kL by 2017). Most of the variation is due to the costs involved in getting the water to where it is required.

In Reducing evaporation losses from farm dams I discused the large evaporation losses from open water storages and some of the methods used to reduce them. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology records an annual evaporation rate at Port Augusta, South Australia, of around two metres.

In his study of pumped hydro sites Andrew Blakers states that the typical area of a pumped hydro dam will be between 10 and 100 hectares, so at two metres evaporation per annum that amounts to between 200 ML and 2 GL lost to evaporation each year. Blakers has estimated that if South Australia was to build enough pumped hydro energy storage to allow 100% renewable energy less than 1% of the state's water extraction from the Murray would be required for topping-up.

One way of reducing evaporation losses would be by floating rafts of solar PV (photovoltaic) panels on the dams, giving the advantage of generating power at the same time. This has been done on a very small scale (photo on the right), and proposed on a much larger scale, at Jamestown in South Australia. There would be challenges relating to the frequent filling and emptying of the dams beneath the floating panels.

Solar panels have been installed on a bigger scale, a megawatt, over irrigation channels in Gujarat, India in a project expected to reduce evaporation by 34 ML per year. Forty megawatts of floating solar panels have also been installed in an area flooded due to coal mining subsidence in China.


ABC 4 Corners program on the illegal extraction of water from the Murray-Darling system, 2017/07/24.

Pumped hydro using seawater

Using seawater for pumped hydro in the drier parts of Australia has obvious advantages over installations using fresh water. Seawater is plentiful and cheap, there is no need to build a lower storage, it is available in lots of places where there are nearby high hills suitable for building the upper storage – coastal cliffs.

It is more challenging in that corrosion and fouling problems would have to be guarded against.

It concerns me from an environmental ground. Anti-fouling chemicals would have to be used to stop organisms from attaching themselves to the turbines and pipes. Since the water would be periodically taken from the sea and put back into the sea it seems that the chemicals would be released into the open sea with possible toxic impacts. Confining the chemicals in a lower storage so that they did not impact sea life removes the financial advantage of not having the lower storage.

So far as I know seawater pumped hydro has only been done once with a high head, as would be used in Australia; a trial project at a Okinawa, Japan.

Links: seawater pumped hydro

Science Direct; Seawater pumped-storage power plant in Okinawa island, Japan; Akitaka Hiratsuka, Takashi Arai, Tsukasa Yoshimura

Wikipedia; Okinawa Yanbaru Seawater Pumped Storage Power Station

Links: seawater pumped hydro in South Australia

Energy Australia: Consortium assessing pumped hydro storage plant in Spencer Gulf, South Australia

Article on the Spencer Gulf project by Simon Holmes a Court, 2017/09/29, in RenewEconomy. Simon goes into detail in the figures, including financial figures as well as storage volumes and power output and storage.

Related pages

On this site...

Base load power: the facts
How should Australia generate its electricity?
South Australia's success with renewable power
Mid-North South Australia, leading the nation in renewable energy
Northern SA's renewables
Wind power in Australia
Impressive renewable energy developments in Australia
Glossary of technical terms relating to wind power
Reducing evaporation losses from farm dams
What is the real cost of water?
Energy from falling water

Climate change
Why accept climate science?
Climate change disasters and the Australian government's actions
Greatest crime in history
Major threatened disasters compared
The end of coal
Killer coal
Coal seam gas: an environmental disaster
The Turnbull Australian Government
Coal seam gas: an environmental disaster

Elsewhere on the Internet...

Australian National University group under Andrew Blakers identified 5000 sites in Queensland, Tasmania, the Canberra district and near Alice Springs, mid 2017. Blakers' group also identified 180 sites in South Australia around mid 2017. They estimated that 400 ha of water storage would be required for SA to reach 100% renewable power; water top-up requirements were estimated to be less than 1% of SA's extraction from the Murray River.

PHES for SA ASAP; Pumped hydro energy storage for South Australia as soon as possible on Facebook

The Conversation; Want energy storage? Here are 22,000 sites for pumped hydro across Australia; by Andrew Blakers, Bin Lu and Matthew Stocks

Energy Storage Association: Pumped Hydroelectric Storage

Wikipedia: Pumped storage hydroelectricity

Pumped hydro using seawater in SA

Energy Australia: Consortium assessing pumped hydro storage plant in South Australia (using sea water)

Renew Economy: South Australia leads again as saltwater pumped hydro storage takes shape; By Simon Holmes a Court; 2017/09/29