However, in the following years the oil supply situation changed substantially; it seemed that we were not going to see 'peak oil' any time soon, but rather we were facing 'peak conventional oil'.
The mining industry discovered that there are huge reserves of coal-seam gas and oil-shale that can be profitably exploited. Unfortunately these resources come with several big disadvantages:
The upper graph at the right, from the Uppsala site, shows the Uppsala group's record of past liquid and gaseous petroleum extraction together with estimated future extraction up to 2050. This shows that extraction is expected to peak in about 2013; other studies vary on exactly when the peak may occur, some placing it as soon as 2008.
(The formal reference for the Uppsala study is "The Study of World Oil Resources and the Impact on IPCC Emissions Scenarios, Anders Sivertsson, Uppsala Hydrocarbon Depletion Study Group, Uppsala University, Sweden, www.isv.uu.se/uhdsg".)
The lower graph at the right, from An Introduction to Peak Oil (Phil Hart, original data attributed to ExxonMobil), shows that the total size of the oil fields discovered world-wide has tended to decline since about 1965.
Other sources report that the amount of oil discovered fell below the amount being consumed in 1960 and has continued to decline since then.
If one looks at the size of the oil fields discovered one also finds that all the really big fields were discovered years ago and smaller and smaller fields are being discovered in recent years.
My impression is that there is no doubt that a peak and following decline in petroleum supply is coming soon, the question is only one of when. As the supply declines we can expect the price to steadily, and probably rather steeply, rise.
So, what else happens as the conventional sources of petroleum run out?
Considering the threat of Climate Change associated with the enhanced Greenhouse Effect, the ideal would be to shift to sustainable fuels, perhaps primarily hydrogen. Unfortunately the world is nowhere near being ready to do so.
coalbed methane in the USA.
Environmental concerns relate to several things:
If there was no leakage of methane and the other potential problems were fully controlled the exploitation of coal-seam gas would be less harmfull, environmentally, than using coal (because burning methane produces roughly twice the useable energy per tonne of CO2 released than burning coal), but burning any fossil fuels must be stopped if we are to limit the damage caused by climate change and ocean acidification.
Coal-seam gas by the numbers, ABC.
above, except that it comes from shale beds which may or may not be associated with petroleum or coal deposits. See Wikipedia.
Shale gas has similar environmental concerns to coal-seam gas.
Reserves are huge. Estimates range up to over a trillion (1000 000 000 000) barrels of oil world-wide.
For more detail see
which is the source for most of the above.
Estimates for the oil price at which coal liquefaction becomes viable vary from around US$30 to US$60 per barrel. As I write (July 2005) the oil price is US$61.
For more detail see Wikipedia, which is the source for some of the above.
The coal is milled, dried and pulverized. It is then fed into a gasifier reactor, and at high pressure and temperature it is converted into synthesis gas (syngas: mainly carbon monoxide and hydrogen).
Fuel gas for domestic and commercial use was produced by this method in
many places before 'natural gas' from petroleum fields became more
above, except that the host rock includes a large proportion of sand with the clay. The clayey sands contain bitumen which can be extracted using hot water and floatation. Usable liquid fuels can then be extracted from the bitumen.
For more detail see Wikipedia, which is the source of some of the above.
Two relevant reports are available from the Uppsala Hydrocarbon Depletion Study Group: A crash program for the Canadian Oil Sands Industry (240KB pdf format), and a Thesis entitled Canada's Oil Sands Resources and Its [sic] Future Impact on Global Oil Supply (1.3MB).
(They are Swedish after all. You can't expect them to be experts in their field and in English as well. I remember a report I did once, I wrote the title as "Observations on the Groundwater of the Clare Valley", on the finished report it came out as "Observations on the Groungwater of the Clare Valley"; embarrassing!)
I have also discussed tar sands under
New World on these pages.
Liquid and gaseous fuels can be produced from firewood and other organic matter, for example garden waste and shit.
Firewood has a roll to play in providing an alternative energy source to petroleum, but, while it is a renewable resource, it is quite impossible to grow enough firewood to replace petroleum at current rates of consumption.
What applies to the USA also applies to other oil importing nations (most Western nations).
Hence we have a world in denial about the impending peak of oil production.
What happens when OPEC nations realise they are sitting on a resource that
is hugely valuable and very limited? One could speculate.
As the price of oil goes up everyone would be wise to try to reduce their requirement for oil. This applies to direct and indirect consumption. You would also be well advised to reduce your dependence on gas, as the price is likely to be closely linked to that of oil.
By indirect consumption of petroleum I am thinking of such things as electricity from oil or gas fired power stations.
What can you do?
CostsMost of the changes that I am suggesting are going to cost something. On the other hand, making the changes early is likely to be less expensive than trying to make them later; as petroleum prices go up, so will costs of production, and many other costs and prices will follow.
Change to a fuel efficient car before the sale price of your big car falls drastically because no-one wants it.
Costs can be minimised by buying second hand and being inventive.
article in the Financial Review on 2021/02/09 about Exxon shutting the Altona oil refinery in the Australian state of Victoria.
Just a few weeks earlier it had been announced that the Kwinana oil refinery in Western Australia would be closing by the middle of 2021. That refinery was reported as being the biggest in Australia and providing about 70% of WA's fuel requirements.
South Australia's only refinery, at Port Stanvac, had been moth-balled in 2003 and permanently closed in 2009.
According to the Australian Institute of Petroleum page on Australian Oil Refineries, which I accessed on 2021/02/10, there are only four oil refineries in the nation, including the two listed for closing. The remaining two are Lytton in Brisbane and the Geelong refinery.
How much energy security does a nation of 25 million people have with only two functioning oil refineries, especially when its government is obsessed with fossil fuels and opposed to renewable energy?
Of course complete self-sufficiency is not only impossible, it is undesirable. A functional society would not consist of a whole lot of people trying to be independent of all other people; self-sufficiency would ideally mean self-sufficient local communities rather than self-sufficient individuals.
However, getting a community organised is not easy and most of us can manage a limited amount of personal self-sufficiency. Most of us would have room for a few fruit trees (especially if we replace some lawn or ornamental garden plants).
By placing solar photovoltaic (electricity generating) panels on your roof you will reduce your dependence on the electricity grid.
Consider running a few chooks (some call them chickens). Chooks can be run in a small area – a suburban back yard for example – will consume kitchen scraps, and will supply you with both eggs and meat.
For those with a bit of spare cash, you could think about buying some land and getting more seriously into raising food and fuel plants; and perhaps running some livestock: a few pigs, sheep, goats, cows, rabbits, whatever. Sheep can provide wool – which can then be turned into clothing – in addition to meat, goats and cows can provide milk and meat. By fuel plants I mean trees for firewood. In South Australia, where I live, gum trees (Eucalypts) can produce useful amounts of firewood in under ten years; they have been successfully introduced to many other countries with temperate climates.
A backyard (or front yard for that matter) vegetable garden will certainly give you some self-sufficiency. If growing crops, try to consider how much energy input they will need. Some crops, I believe, consume more energy than they yield 211; if grown using the highly industrial modern methods.
You should also consider things like water supply. The electricity supply for running a pump may become less reliable in the future. Can you put in rainwater tanks or a well? If you have more space perhaps you can build a dam?
Building a cellar will provide a place where things can be stored at a constant temperature while, unlike a refrigerator, not needing any input of energy to operate. It will also provide you with a place where you can escape the heat on those exceptionally hot summer days when the electrical grid goes down. Failures of the electricity supply are likely to become more frequent as the oil supply fails.
On this page...